<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Julia L. Ritchey &#187; Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://juliaritchey.com/tag/obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://juliaritchey.com</link>
	<description>Multimedia Freelancer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:37:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Innovation Patty Melt</title>
		<link>http://juliaritchey.com/2011/01/27/innovation-patty-melt/</link>
		<comments>http://juliaritchey.com/2011/01/27/innovation-patty-melt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>julia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state of the union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gavelwrench.com/?p=2707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I opted to watch The King&#8217;s Speech instead of President Obama&#8217;s address Tuesday night. I felt okay with my decision after reading the transcript, which Paul Krugman aptly described using a cranky cat poster. Though by far my favorite reaction came from David Rothkopf of Foreign Policy. The first post I want to highlight for comparing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I opted to watch <em>The King&#8217;s Speech</em> instead of President Obama&#8217;s address Tuesday night. I felt okay with my decision after reading the transcript, which Paul Krugman aptly described using a <a title="Meh." href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/25/sotu/" target="_blank">cranky cat</a> poster. Though by far my favorite reaction came from David Rothkopf of <em>Foreign Policy.</em> The <a title="SOTU Leave It to Beaver style" href="http://rothkopf.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/01/26/a_state_of_the_union_just_like_beaver_cleavers_mom_used_to_make" target="_blank">first post</a> I want to highlight for comparing the speech to a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.</p>
<blockquote><p>It was heavy on the sugar, but that was offset with a little crunchy practicality. It was remarkably unremarkable for a nation that has reeled from terrorist attack to war to financial calamity over the past decade. But in that vein, it will probably be widely embraced as the political comfort food it was intended to be.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m a sucker for smart metaphors, especially when they involve food. If more columnists used food metaphors to portray political speeches, not only would I be more interested in politics, but maybe we&#8217;d end up with more inventive topping combinations. For example, Rep. Paul Ryan&#8217;s response for the GOP? Grilled salami and Nutella on rye.*</p>
<p>Yet it&#8217;s really Rothkopf&#8217;s <a title="Innovate!" href="http://rothkopf.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/01/25/the_myth_of_the_innovation_nation" target="_blank">second post</a> to which I want to draw your attention. In it, he criticizes some of the rhetoric that&#8217;s been used lately to push for more innovation.</p>
<blockquote><p>It is the widely subscribed to notion &#8230; often cited by politicians and op-ed writers &#8230; that somehow there is something special, some gene in American DNA, that makes us uniquely capable when it comes to innovation. &#8230;But the reality is that the idea that the United States has somehow cornered the market on innovation is an overblown myth.</p></blockquote>
<p>He goes on to list a whole bunch of stuff we didn&#8217;t invent, as well as some stuff we sometimes <em>think</em> we invented but just perfected. His point being that lots of amazing things were created by people who lived or came from countries perceived as being less innovative. And that there are better ways to encourage people to innovate than invoking the doctrine of American exceptionalism.</p>
<blockquote><p>Could the president have promoted American growth and better lives in the future without implying that we live in a zero sum world full of actors who are working hard to defeat us?</p></blockquote>
<p>Hear, hear.  I mean, to some extent I get it. Some nationalistic fervor is par for the course. And we know China can be <a title="Nurse-fed gymnasts" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/27/sports/27iht-OLY.4.14814210.html" target="_blank">ridiculously competitive</a> at times. But this isn&#8217;t Rocky IV. Just because China produces more solar panels doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;re gonna Win the Future, whatever that means.</p>
<p>But forget all that. I think it&#8217;s time to retire the word innovation anyway. It&#8217;s a tired buzzword with too many meanings to too many people.</p>
<p>And another thing: Geoffrey Rush deserves another Oscar. If you&#8217;re reading this, Academy members, please give it to him.</p>
<p>*In truth, I didn&#8217;t read the rebuttal, nor have I ever tried this sandwich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://juliaritchey.com/2011/01/27/innovation-patty-melt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama, Ghana, New Media (Radio)</title>
		<link>http://juliaritchey.com/2009/07/14/obama-ghana-new-media-radio/</link>
		<comments>http://juliaritchey.com/2009/07/14/obama-ghana-new-media-radio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>julia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ghana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliaritchey.com/?p=1403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been showcasing my TV pieces lately, but I&#8217;ve also been doing some interesting stuff for the English to Africa division, so far my favorite division in VOA. Below is the slightly altered radio version of my TV piece for the show &#8220;Africa News Tonight,&#8221; which airs twice daily across Africa. Colleague Nico Colombant shot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been showcasing my TV pieces lately, but I&#8217;ve also been doing some interesting stuff for the English to Africa division, so far my favorite division in VOA.  Below is the slightly altered radio version of my TV piece for the show &#8220;Africa News Tonight,&#8221; which airs twice daily across Africa. Colleague Nico Colombant shot the video and took pictures, which was all packaged nicely on the <a title="Original story on VOA" href="http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-07-10-voa27.cfm" target="_blank">Web site</a>.<br />
[display_podcast]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://juliaritchey.com/2009/07/14/obama-ghana-new-media-radio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama and Iran</title>
		<link>http://juliaritchey.com/2009/06/22/obama-and-iran/</link>
		<comments>http://juliaritchey.com/2009/06/22/obama-and-iran/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>julia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliaritchey.com/?p=1364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://juliaritchey.com/2009/06/22/obama-and-iran/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lost and the Obama Afterglow</title>
		<link>http://juliaritchey.com/2009/01/21/lost-and-the-obama-afterglow/</link>
		<comments>http://juliaritchey.com/2009/01/21/lost-and-the-obama-afterglow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>julia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliaritchey.com/?p=861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, play this: [Audio:http://www.moviesoundclips.net/tv1/lost/theme.mp3] You either think this is A) the eerie sound of a new era of fiscal responsibility and transparent government or  B) the most titillating title sequence known to mankind, belonging to ABC&#8217;s Lost, which premiers its fifth season tonight. Both would be correct. The picture of a sunbathed Oval Office with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, play this:<br />
[Audio:http://www.moviesoundclips.net/tv1/lost/theme.mp3]<br />
You either think this is A) the eerie sound of a new era of fiscal responsibility and transparent government or  B) the most titillating title sequence known to mankind, belonging to ABC&#8217;s <em>Lost</em>, which premiers its fifth season tonight. Both would be correct.</p>
<p>The <a title="Good photography" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/22/us/politics/22obamacnd.html?_r=1&amp;hp" target="_blank">picture</a> of a sunbathed Oval Office with Obama on the phone on the front of the New York Times&#8217; Web site seemed like it was ripped straight from an Aaron Sorkin script, and I liked it. I don&#8217;t mind pulling from the oft-criticized quote of our first lady when I say for the first time in a really long while &#8212; eight years to be exact &#8212; I&#8217;m really proud of my country. It has as much to do with a change in administration as it does the already changed tone in Washington. The notion that maybe those of us without American flag flip flops can still be seen as valuable members of society and not unpatriotic pinkos is a huge relief.</p>
<p>Sadly, work was a big letdown today because all the excited and optimistic people vacated Washington, leaving only the cranky federal employees behind.</p>
<p><strong>LOST</strong></p>
<p>So I will not be watching <em>Lost</em> live because I have a pilates class today (I sound like a schmuck when I say that) and I can&#8217;t get to a friend&#8217;s TV in time after that. This was really poor planning on my part, but I really blame Alex and Emily, my friends who live closest to me, for not owning a television either. Please, no spoilers. I&#8217;m watching it online tomorrow. *really big disappointing sigh*</p>
<p>Time dot com&#8217;s James Poniewozick has been <a title="Loooooost lovers" href="http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/" target="_blank">blogging</a> about it all day and raises some great questions. (Yeah, what <em>is</em> the deal with Claire? Yeah, just <em>whose</em> side is Ben on now? Yeah, <em>is</em> this show going to go more fantasy than sci fi?)</p>
<p>This other link is from last year, but it&#8217;s not too late to throw a <em>Lost</em> <a title="Open jars of peanut butter and mayonnaise for Hurley? Check." href="http://www.zap2it.com/tv/zap-story-tvparty-lost,0,7364286.story" target="_blank">theme party</a> (note to self: throw <em>Lost</em> theme party for season six). For all those lost on <em>Lost</em>, you will be unhappy with this site for the rest of the year because one out of every four entries will most likely pertain to this show. I have an analogy. Remember David Lynch&#8217;s twisted series <em>Twin Peaks</em>? It&#8217;s pretty much the same show, just set on a crazy, crazy island.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://juliaritchey.com/2009/01/21/lost-and-the-obama-afterglow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inauguration Updates</title>
		<link>http://juliaritchey.com/2009/01/20/inauguration-updates/</link>
		<comments>http://juliaritchey.com/2009/01/20/inauguration-updates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>julia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliaritchey.com/2009/01/20/inauguration-updates/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Best Of &#124; 9:32 p.m. I made a &#8220;best of&#8221; all 128 photos I took today. I decided to convert them to black and white because my camera doesn&#8217;t really pick up on color as vibrantly as it should, and because history is always framed in black and white. I don&#8217;t normally incorporate such literal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a title="A new era of responsibility" href="http://juliaritchey.com/photos/january-20-2009" target="_self"><img class="alignright" title="Hope!" src="http://photos-b.ak.fbcdn.net/photos-ak-snc1/v1978/244/50/39605579/n39605579_33776897_7278.jpg" alt="" width="238" height="178" /></a>Best Of | 9:32 p.m.</strong> I made a <a title="Inauguration album uploaded to photos" href="http://juliaritchey.com/photos/january-20-2009" target="_blank">&#8220;best of&#8221; all 128 photos</a> I took today. I decided to convert them to black and white because my camera doesn&#8217;t really pick up on color as vibrantly as it should, and because history is always framed in black and white. I don&#8217;t normally incorporate such literal metaphors into my work, but it made sense for this album. It also tied the pictures together.<br />
<strong>Crowd Sampling | 9:32 p.m. </strong>Here&#8217;s the fruit of Catherine&#8217;s and my <a title="Record Crowds Witness Historic Inauguration" href="http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-01-20-voa47.cfm" target="_blank">labor</a>. It certainly doesn&#8217;t capture the flavor as much as if you saw the pictures of the people who spoke to us. Luckily, I&#8217;ve almost got the picture album ready with some of these folks in it. (Note: I really don&#8217;t know how our Web desk operates, but it seems really malnourished. I record a fake intro to my audio that the language services chop off, however, you&#8217;ll notice they left it on when posting it to the web. Thus, I end up introducing my own piece in the third person, which just sounds so awkward. I&#8217;ll post the audio here if they fix it.)<br />
<strong>Are We in A Dream? | 4:08 p.m. </strong>Is it all a dream? It really, really feels like it. I spoke to so many hopeful people this morning. Catherine and I gave some bites over to our correspondents then went up to the fourth floor (crept up is more like it) and watched the most magnificent American spectacle I shall probably ever see (one of the best/warmest views on the Mall). I will try to post more if I ever make it home (don&#8217;t count on it).<br />
<strong>Two Hours To Go | 9:47 a.m.</strong> I&#8217;M HERE!!!! I can&#8217;t convey to you how exciting it is to be this close to the Capitol with swarms of people in every direction. It took me an hour and a half to get here (VOA building) from Silver Spring, but it took Catherine three hours from Arlington; thank goodness I don&#8217;t live in Virginia.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to try to update this one entry throughout the day (à la semi-live blogging). Pics to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://juliaritchey.com/2009/01/20/inauguration-updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

